Gourmet News

Specialty Food Association Honors 6 with Leadership Awards

Published March 13, 2018

By Robin Mather

The Specialty Food Association recognized the positive contributions of six members who, while running their own businesses, took time to do something to improve their communities and the world. The sixth annual Leadership Awards were presented to the recipients at the Winter Fancy Food Show in San Francisco, California, in January.

Former Whole Foods Co-CEO Walter Robb keynoted the awards ceremony, speaking about how quickly things have changed in the specialty foods industry, and the imperative for retailers to keep up. “Salt, butter and sugar — that was the Holy Trinity in the early days of the Specialty Food Association,” he said. “We have never seen a rate of change happening this fast. The present has never been this temporary.”

He urged the audience to “lead from a sense of purpose and of mission,” which helped him grow Whole Foods from a “little natural foods store in 1978” to the retail leader it is today. New retailing opportunities mean that “we’re all looking at an incredibly expanding world of food in an endless aisle.”

The awards recognized two business owners in each of three categories: business leadership, citizenship and vision. In the business leadership category, honorees were recognized for advancing best practices to benefit food industry employees. Meg Barnhart of The Zen of Slow Cooking in Lake Forest, Illinois, was lauded for the company’s social mission of hiring employees with disabilities for their packaging team. The Zen of Slow Cooking was also recently became a Certified B Corp.

“Who knew a slow cooker would be a vehicle for change?” Barnhart quipped while noting that her company got its beginnings in her discovery of the slow cooker as a boon to the overburdened mother. The company’s Sichuan Slow Cooker Spice Blend won a sofi Award for best new product in the seasonings and spice category last year.

Christopher J. Patton of the Midwest Elderberry Cooperative and River Hills Harvest Marketers LLC of Minneapolis, Minnesota, was also honored in the in the business leadership category. Under Patton’s guidance, a cooperative of elderberry growers got its start in the upper Midwest, giving growers a chance to compete against imported European elderberry products.
Walking, jogging and swimming can enhance your viagra fast shipping cardiovascular health but is also ineffective. The drugs help increase excitement with your Going Here cheapest levitra partner. Your reproductive function declines http://appalachianmagazine.com/2016/12/25/why-early-appalachian-settlers-originally-celebrated-christmas-in-january/ lowest priced cialis with age, which can cause erection problems. So when a pill arrived, this http://appalachianmagazine.com/2017/03/23/you-should-run-candidate-training-classes-scheduled-across-west-virginia/ viagra ordination was the ultimate answer. “Thanks for recognizing a co-op that harvests this nutrition-dense little berry,” Patton said. “It shows that human cooperation will not go away, despite technology.”

In the citizenship category, Ryan Emmons of Waiakea Hawaiian Volcanic Water in Culver, California, was recognized for the company’s social mission: The company donates a week’s supply of clean water to drought-stricken regions of Malawi for every liter sold. More than 500 million liters of water have been channeled to rural regions through the company’s charity partner, Pump Aid.

Sam Mogannum of Bi-Rite Market in San Francisco, California, was also honored in the citizenship category for the company’s many contributions to its community, including a nonprofit called 18 Reasons, a subsidized cooking school that gives consumers confidence to buy, cook and eat good food. The program connects with roughly 6,000 students and community members per year. “We’re all about community, love, passion and integrity,” Mogannum said. Speaking of 18 Reasons, he said, “We all need to lead with more love.”

Mohammed Ashour of the Aspire Food Group in Austin, Texas, was honored in the vision category. Aspire aims to end hunger and protein insuffiencies by producing roasted cricket snacks under the Aketta label here in the United States. The company also grows palm weevil larvae for family sustenance in Ghana.

Thierry Ollivier of Natierra by Brandstorm in Van Nuys, California, was also honored in the vision category. Ollivier’s company was the first to offer Himalayan pink salt in the United States, and introduced the goji berry to Whole Foods. The company’s Feed a Soul program provides a meal for every child in a school in Haiti. “So far, we have provided 350,000 free meals to school children,” Ollivier said. “Our goal is 1 million meals in 2018.” In a poignant moment, he dedicated his award to his late two-and-a-half-year-old daughter, who died two days before Feed a Soul launched.

“These six specialty food entrepreneurs reflect the great power and impact of our growing industry on society at large,” said Phil Kafarakis, President of the Specialty Food Association. “It’s an honor to recognize their positive social, economic, and environmental achievements – all undertaken while also meeting the daily challenges of managing successful businesses.”

Nominations were made by members of the Specialty Food Association and others in the specialty food industry. A panel of judges composed of industry experts and influencers selected the honorees from more than 50 nominees. The judges included: Polly Adema, University of the Pacific, San Francisco, California; Cathy Cochran-Lewis, Whole Foods Market, Austin, Texas; Lou Cooperhouse, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey; Margaret Core, Food Marketing Institute, Washington, D.C.; Maren Keeley, Conscious Company Magazine, Seattle, Washington; Bruce Nierenberg, Greyston Bakery, Yonkers, New York; John Raiche, UNFI, Providence, Rhode Island; and Lisa Sposato, City Harvest, New York, New York.

USDA Withdraws Animal Welfare Rule from National Organic Program

Published March 12, 2018

By Lorrie Baumann

The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced Monday that it is withdrawing the animal welfare regulation it had delayed three times. The rule would have established animal welfare standards that would have applied to the producers of organic livestock and eggs. The regulation was proposed in the waning days of the Obama administration after the completion of a rulemaking process that included extensive public comments, which were overwhelmingly in favor of adopting the new standards. In the opposite camp was the National Pork Producers Council, which applauded the USDA action. The USDA delayed the rule following the inauguration of the Trump administration, and then delayed it further. Before the final withdrawal, the rule had been scheduled to take effect in May and would have applied only to products bearing the USDA-certified organic seal.

The Obama-era regulation – the Organic Livestock and Poultry Practices rule – would have incorporated into the National Organic Program welfare standards that were not based on science and that were outside the scope of the Organic Food Production Act of 1990, according to the National Pork Producers Council, which maintains that the Organic Food Production Act limited consideration of livestock as organic to feeding and medication practices.

“We’d like to thank Sec. Perdue and the Trump administration for listening to our concerns with the rule and recognizing the serious challenges it would have presented our producers,” said NPPC President Ken Maschhoff, a pork producer from Carlyle, Illinois.

Does the medicine work buy canada levitra immediately after consumption? No, you need to give some time to the user to have satisfying love-making and enjoy the climax to its fullest. This kind is lowest cost viagra short lived and only applicable when the victim is preparing to have sex. Ginseng, a blessing in disguise is a tonic herb that rejuvenates your mind and body. tadalafil cheapest online It results in an unsatisfactory sexual experience for both them and loved that sildenafil shop their partner. The rule would have required that poultry must be housed in spaces that are big enough for the birds to move freely, stretch their wings, stand normally and engage in natural behaviors. Livestock, including poultry, would have been required to have access to outdoor space year-round. The rule would have banned the current practice, followed by some poultry producers, of confining birds to barns with a screened porch as their only access to the outdoors.

NPPC maintains that animal production practices have nothing to do with the basic concept of “organic.” The Organic Trade Association begs to differ. “USDA wrongly alleges that the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990 (OFPA) does not authorize the animal welfare provisions of the OLPP final rule, and, in doing so, cites definitions of organic outside the law,” the organization said in a statement.

“It is notable that USDA cites the Merriam-Webster dictionary to justify a definition of ‘organic,'” said Organic Trade Association CEO and Executive Director Laura Batcha. “Merriam-Webster also defines outdoor as ‘not enclosed; having no roof,’ and porches as ‘a covered area…having a separate roof.’ Organic standards already require that organic producers provide their animals access to the outdoors. So, by the assessment from Merriam-Webster, a source which USDA endorses in its official notice, porches are clearly not allowed in organic.”

The Organic Trade Association has filed suit in an attempt to force the USDA to implement the rule and will now be amending its complaint to challenge this new USDA action. “Since the filing of our lawsuit last September, a host of organic stakeholders representing thousands of organic farming families, organic certifiers and organic policymakers – along with leading animal welfare and retail groups speaking out for millions of consumers — have joined our challenge,” Batcha said. “The organic sector depends on USDA to set organic standards fairly and according to the law. When USDA fails to do this, it is time for the organic community to insist that it live up to its responsibility.”

Grocers Taking Action to Prevent Food Waste

Published March 12, 2018

By Lorrie Baumann

The value of food wasted in the U.S. retail food sector amounts to $18 billion a year – roughly double the retail food industry’s annual profits, which is why food retailers are taking another look at their opportunities to reduce food waste instead of regarding wasted food as just a fixed cost of doing business. Ahold Delhaize, Kroger and Walmart, three of the nation’s top 10 retailers, have all set public goals for reducing the amount of food they’re sending to the landfill.

“Food waste is an $18 billion problem, but also an opportunity for retailers,” said Chris Cochran, Executive Director of ReFED, a nonprofit agency powered by a network of business, nonprofit, foundation and government leaders committed to reducing U.S. food waste. “If you can flip that around, you can double the profit from food.”

Food waste is rising to the top of grocery retailers’ list of controllable expenses that can produce cost savings, Cochran said. “Employees want to be feeding their customers; they don’t want to see food going to the landfill,” he said. “This is an important motivator for employees.”

In addition to reducing costs for retailers, reducing food waste could have important effects on climate change. Paul Hawken, in his 2016 book “Drawdown,” identified elimination of food waste as the third-highest priority among potential solutions to the problem of climate change that are doable today. Food waste rose to near the top of Hawken’s list of contributors to the problem of global warming because the greenhouse gases produced by the decay of the wasted food are added to the greenhouse gases generated by agricultural production, processing and transportation of that food. In the U.S., we waste 63 million tons of food annually, at a cost of $218 billion. All of this wasted food consumes 20 percent of freshwater, fertilizer, cropland and landfill space in America, according to ReFED.

ReFED released in January its “Retail Food Waste Action Guide,” a 44-page description of how grocers can reduce food waste through strategies for prevention, recovery and recycling, with prevention as the avenue that offers the highest returns to retailers, according to the report. Recovery, usually involving food donations, is a strategy that’s becoming more feasible as improvements in demand forecasting give retailers more chance to identify food that’s available for donation, and recycling has significant untapped potential, although its economics are very sensitive to local costs for labor, disposal fees, compost values and energy prices, according to the report.

Consumer education, direct-to-consumer delivery, meal kits and improved inventory management are among the strategies that retailers can use to prevent food waste. Opportunities to improve food recovery lie in better storage, handling and transportation of food to be donated, improvements in software to match food available for donation with agencies that can use the food and more knowledge for retailers about the liability involved in donating food. Recycling opportunities include strategies for diverting wasted food to farmers that can use it as animal feed and centralized composting. The solutions identified by the report that have the greatest profit potential for retailers are all prevention strategies. These are improved inventory management, cold chain management, dynamic routing, enhanced demand forecasting and dynamic pricing and markdowns. The solutions that are easiest for retailers to do, sometimes because they require less capital investment, are consumer education campaigns, standardized donation regulation, donation matching software and reduced handling. Direct-to-customer delivery and meal kits fit into the middle of the range of solutions, both in terms of profit potential and feasibility.

Many retailers are already experimenting with preventing waste by giving consumers the opportunity to buy “imperfect” produce that’s still wholesome and safe to eat. Kroger, in particular, is promoting the option of buying “ugly food” through efforts to prominently display and sell slightly blemished, undersized or misshapen produce at a reduced price.
It will help to maintain the body discover for more now discount levitra weight and create a fresh mood every day. sildenafil 50mg price You can get this type of medicine you can get these products online as no prescription is necessary. In other words, guys don’t get erections when they order cheap viagra continue reading this link now don’t have the desire for sex. Therefore in order to be protected from the impacts of this solution can bring the happiness back valsonindia.com buy generic viagra in your sex life.
Standardized date labeling, although not entirely in grocer’s hands, is a prevention strategy that’s being advanced by the Food Marketing Institute and Grocery Manufacturing Association trade groups. FMI and GMA have developed a voluntary national standard for date label language that’s due to be broadly implemented throughout the U.S. by this summer. The Consumer Goods Forum has announced that its members would adopt the same language. Walmart and Sam’s Club have already converted to a “Best If Used By” date label terminology for all privately branded products, and more than 92 percent of these products are currently in compliance.

Glen’s Garden Market is a grocery retailer with two locations in Washington, D.C. that’s working intensively on the problem of food waste as part of an overall goal of making progress on climate change, according to Founder Danielle Vogel. She used to be an environmental lawyer, working with Congress on climate change issues, but she gradually became discouraged and finally decided that entrepreneurship offered her a greater opportunity for activism. She opened her first grocery store on DuPont Circle on Earth Day of 2013. “When you walk into our stores, what you see is a very beautiful grocery store – but what you’re actually experiencing is a deliberate change agent,” she said. “Glen’s Garden Market exists to make climate change progress one bit at a time by serving good food from close by and growing relationships with partners who treat their land, their animals and their ingredients with respect.”

The markets are small format stores, competing on the experience they offer their customers rather than on selection and price point, and the stores are solar powered, not through solar panels on the roof but through the purchase of renewable energy credits to offset all power consumption. “When you look at a grocery store, it’s a room surrounded by refrigerators,” she said. “It’s an energy-intensive proposition to own a grocery store.” The stores offer no paper or plastic bags at checkout, and they act as drop-off points for compost scraps in a city that doesn’t offer municipal composting services. “We have people who are not buying anything, who are just stopping off to compost,” Vogel said.

The stores operate under a mandate to waste nothing. That means that the onsite chef has to walk through the grocery store every day to identify food that needs to be used quickly and then figure out how to turn it into food that can be presented for sale in the ready-to-eat cases. “Our chef has to repurpose absolutely everything,” Vogel said. “We are engaging in what we like to refer to as the ‘Glen’s Chopped Challenge.’ It’s a ridiculous economic result to buy food only to throw it away.”

For its first five years of its existence, Glen’s Garden Market kept its environmental agenda quiet because Vogel felt that concern about climate change had been labeled in Washington as a “job killer” or a tax burden, but then, when Donald Trump won the Presidential election in 2016, the stores held a “climate change coming out party,” Vogel said. “At this point, if you’re not with us, you’re against us,” she said. “We lost a little bit of business because of it, but not a lot.”

As a result of its focus on climate change activism and its resultant focus on local food sourcing, Glen’s Garden Market has helped to launch 80 local food businesses, of which 44 are owned by women and almost 60 are located in Washington D.C. “We grow small businesses along with our own,” Vogel said. “Together, we are collaborating to displace demand for industrialized food.”

“In our stores, most of the inventory comes into the stores in the arms of the people who made it. They often made it today,” she continued. “This means that the store is not necessarily price competitive, but when people come into the stores, they’re surrounded by food that was chosen with their values in mind.”